
Microsoft Product Designer Case Interview (Engineering-Aligned) for M365/Intelligent Cloud
Overview: A 60-minute whiteboard or Figma-on-laptop case simulating end-to-end product thinking on a Microsoft-scale problem. You will design for an enterprise and consumer-grade surface area (e.g., Teams, OneDrive/SharePoint, Outlook, Azure Portal) while demonstrating inclusive design, systems thinking, and ability to collaborate with PM and engineering. Expect Microsoft-specific constraints such as tenant and admin policies, global scale, performance, privacy/compliance, and Fluent Design. Agenda (typical): - 5 min: Introductions, role context, what good looks like (growth mindset, customer empathy, collaboration). - 10 min: Problem framing and clarifying questions (users, jobs-to-be-done, success criteria, constraints, out-of-scope). - 20 min: Exploration and concepting (task flows, wireframes, information architecture, states, edge cases, accessibility and localization). - 15 min: Deep dive on one solution (trade-offs, tech feasibility with engineering, data/telemetry plan, experiments, rollout strategy). - 5 min: Wrap-up (risks, iteration plan, how you would validate with research, Q&A). Representative case prompts (interviewer selects one): - Design a way in Microsoft Teams to reduce context switching between chat, meetings, and shared content for hybrid workers while respecting enterprise admin policies and compliance. - Create an experience in OneDrive/SharePoint that helps small businesses migrate from third-party storage with minimal downtime, clear progress, and strong data-loss prevention signals. - Improve Azure Portal cost awareness for new developers by surfacing proactive, actionable anomaly alerts without overwhelming expert users. What interviewers probe (Microsoft-specific focus areas): - Inclusive design and accessibility: Persona spectrum thinking, keyboard-only and screen reader flows, color contrast, motion sensitivity options; aim for WCAG AA parity and Fluent UI patterns. - Enterprise readiness: Multi-tenant considerations, role-based access (end user vs. admin), data residency, retention and eDiscovery, DLP impacts on UX. - Systems thinking: How the design fits within Microsoft 365 or Azure ecosystems, cross-platform adaptations (Windows, iOS, Android, Web), leverage of Fluent Design System and Fluent UI components. - Data-informed design: North-star and guardrail metrics (task success, time-to-complete, adoption, retention, reliability signals), experimentation approach (A/B), telemetry events, and ethical use of data. - Engineering collaboration: Design trade-offs that reduce complexity, performance and reliability constraints, progressive rollout and feature flags, localization and right-to-left support. - Communication and culture: Clear structure (often using STAR), growth mindset, ability to receive and iterate on critique, and accountability to customer outcomes. Expected artifacts during the session: - Problem statement and success criteria. - Primary personas and key scenarios (happy path and critical edge cases, including accessibility and low-bandwidth states). - Sketches or low-fidelity wireframes with annotated flows and system interactions (error, empty, loading, offline, permission-gated states). - Metrics and validation plan (what to log, how to evaluate, experiment design, risks and mitigations). Evaluation rubric (how performance is assessed): - Problem framing and prioritization: Clarity of goals, constraints, and measures of success; ability to say no to lower-impact areas. - Product thinking at Microsoft scale: Addresses enterprise, privacy, compliance, and global user needs; considers admins and IT. - Design craft and systems usage: Logical IA and flows; effective use or extension of Fluent; thoughtful cross-platform considerations. - Accessibility and inclusivity: Proactive handling of assistive tech scenarios and persona spectrum; concrete choices to meet WCAG AA. - Collaboration and communication: Structured reasoning, active listening, rationale for trade-offs; invites engineering and PM perspectives. - Data and experimentation: Clear metrics, hypotheses, and rollout plan; awareness of telemetry, experimentation, and ethical considerations. Anti-patterns to avoid: - Optimizing for pixel polish over enterprise and accessibility constraints. - Ignoring admin policies, compliance, or reliability at scale. - Proposing net-new UI paradigms without leveraging or extending Fluent. - Lacking a validation and metrics plan or hand-waving on feasibility. Logistics and tools: - Format: Onsite whiteboard or remote via Microsoft Teams and Microsoft Whiteboard or Figma. - You may be asked to talk through past work briefly if relevant, but the case is the primary signal for problem solving, inclusivity, and collaboration.
60 minutes
Practice with our AI-powered interview system to improve your skills.
About This Interview
Interview Type
PRODUCT SENSE
Difficulty Level
4/5
Interview Tips
• Research the company thoroughly
• Practice common questions
• Prepare your STAR method responses
• Dress appropriately for the role