
Amazon Behavioral Interview for Data Analyst (LP-focused, Bar Raiser-style)
This behavioral interview assesses how Data Analyst candidates apply Amazon’s Leadership Principles (LPs) in real, data-intensive situations. Expect a 60‑minute, 1:1 conversation (often with a Bar Raiser or senior analyst/manager) that uses the STAR method with layered follow‑ups to “Dive Deep.” The interviewer looks for crisp narratives, quantified impact, mechanisms you built, and evidence you consistently raise the bar. Primary focus areas tied to LPs: - Customer Obsession & Ownership: Defining the right customer/ business problem, selecting the north-star metric, and taking end‑to‑end responsibility (from data quality to decision enablement). - Dive Deep & Are Right, A Lot: Investigating ambiguous metrics, root-causing data issues, reconciling conflicting sources, and explaining trade‑offs/assumptions. - Deliver Results & Bias for Action: Prioritization under time pressure, unblocking stakeholders, and shipping analyses/dashboards that drove measurable outcomes. - Earn Trust & Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit: Influencing PMs/engineers with data, handling pushback, and committing after a decision. - Insist on the Highest Standards & Learn and Be Curious: Building mechanisms (QA checks, documentation, alerts) and demonstrating continual improvement. - Success and Scale Bring Broad Responsibility: Responsible data usage, privacy/security considerations, and preventing unintended consequences of metrics. What the interview typically covers: - 5–7 LP‑anchored prompts with probing follow‑ups that ask for concrete numbers (e.g., baseline vs. post‑change, % lift, $ impact), your metric definitions (denominator, filters, time window), and how you validated results. - Evidence of mechanisms you created: data quality monitors, SLAs, metric dictionaries, experiment guardrails, or automation that reduced manual work. - Stakeholder dynamics: partnering with PM/engineering/ops, clarifying ambiguous asks, and influencing decisions with clear narratives and visuals. - Ownership of failures: a miss or defect you owned, how you detected it, the blast radius, and how you prevented recurrence. - Level calibration: L4 examples show solid execution within a team; L5 examples show cross‑team influence, selection of business‑critical metrics, and durable mechanisms. Example prompts you may encounter: - “Tell me about a time you defined a new metric that changed a decision.” - “Describe a time you found a serious data quality issue late in a launch. What did you do and what changed afterward?” - “Give an example where stakeholders disagreed with your analysis. How did you handle it and what was the outcome?” - “Walk me through an analysis you delivered under a tight deadline. How did you prioritize and what was the measurable impact?” - “Describe a mechanism you built (dashboard/alert/QA) that improved accuracy or speed at scale.” What strong answers look like: - Specific, recent, end‑to‑end stories with quantified outcomes (e.g., +/-% on key KPIs, hours saved, $ revenue/cost impact) and explicit metric definitions. - Clear articulation of assumptions, caveats, and validation steps; ability to explain anomalies and edge cases. - Demonstrated influence (docs, visuals, or decision narratives) and willingness to disagree then commit. Logistics and expectations: - No coding test in this round, but you may be asked to define a metric precisely or outline how you would validate a surprising result. - Interviewers expect concise STAR structure, crisp data recall, and reflection on “what you’d do differently” to show learning and higher standards.
60 minutes
Practice with our AI-powered interview system to improve your skills.
About This Interview
Interview Type
BEHAVIOURAL
Difficulty Level
4/5
Interview Tips
• Research the company thoroughly
• Practice common questions
• Prepare your STAR method responses
• Dress appropriately for the role